USPTO serial 73791669
EASY MILLION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY MILLION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
EDMONTON,ALBERTA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. RANDALL KING
D RANDALL KING MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH EDELL, ET ALSTE ONE THOUSANDNORWEST CTRSAINT PAUL, MN 55101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | NOVELTY ITEMS; NAMELY A PAPER PACKAGE CONTAINING A BOOKLET, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO TRIVIA FACTS RELATING TO WEALTH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |