USPTO serial 73791967
GROUPO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUSER, BLAINE T.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROUPO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAMON A. KLITZKE II
RAMON A KLITZKE II KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, CAMPBELL, ET AL121 S W SALMON STSTE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, CAGES, CARRIERS, CABLES, HANDLEBARS STEMS, HANDLEBARS GRIPS, KICKSTANDS, BICYCLE LAMPS, BICYCLE LOCKS, PEDALS, SEATS, TUBES AND BICYCLE TOOLS | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1988 |
| 018 | CARRYING BAGS, NAMELY, TOTE BAGS MOUNTABLE ON A BICYCLE FOR CARRYING GOODS | ABANDONED | Aug 31, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |