USPTO serial 73791975
SANYO, THE SMART SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2263847Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 1999
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANYO, THE SMART SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MORIGUCHI CITY, OSAKA 570, JP
MORIGUCHI CITY, OSAKA 570, JP
MORIGUCHI CITY, OSAKA 570, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON D COPLEIN
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CASH REGISTERS; FACSIMILE RECEIVERS; ELECTRONIC CALCULATORS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS, KEYBOARDS FOR COMPUTERS; DISPLAY MONITORS; CD ROM DRIVE UNITS, CD ROMS; FRAMES, NAMELY, CABINETS FOR OFFICE AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT, COMPUTERS AND FACSIMILE RECEIVERS; FLOPPY DISCS; PHOTOCOPIERS, PLAIN PAPER COPIERS; ELECTRONIC PRINTERS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS, WORD PROCESSORS; OPTICAL DOCUMENT FILE SYSTEMS COMPRISING AN OPTICAL DISC AND OPTICAL DISC DRIVE FOR STORING DATA CORRESPONDING TO DOCUMENTS, PICTURES AND DRAWINGS, DISPLAY AND POSSIBLY ONE OR MORE OF AN OPTICAL IMAGE SCANNER, COMPUTER, KEYBOARD AND/OR PRINTER; VIDEO AND AUDIO TAPE RECORDERS, TELEPHONES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | PAPER SHREDDERS FOR OFFICE USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named SANYO, THE SMART SOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |