USPTO serial 73792019
DB2-XPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DB2-XPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. JAFFER
DAVID H JAFFER ROSENBLUM, PARIS & BACIGALUPIFIFTEENTH FL160 W SANTA CLARA STSAN JOSE, CA 95113Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATA MANIPULATION; IN TESTING AND MAINTENANCE OF DATABASE INFORMATION; IN CODE GENERATION; ND IN COMPUTER PROGRAM DESIGN, MAINTENANCE, AND ANALYSIS | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 1989 |
| 016 | INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR SUCH COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1990 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |