USPTO serial 73792056
QU/IT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QU/IT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. NEEDLE
WILLIAM H NEEDLE NEEDLE & ROSENBERG, PCSTE 400133 CARNEGIE WAY, N WATLANTA, GA 30303Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSORS, ELECTRONIC WORD PROCESSORS, COMPUTER PRINTERS, COMPUTER PLOTTERS, VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS, KEYBOARDS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE NAMELY, A FILE INTERROGATION TOOL PROVIDING QUERY, REPORTING AND UPDATE OF IN COMPUTER FILE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |