Drawing for ENGINEERING TOMORROW'S TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 73792721

ENGINEERING TOMORROW'S TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1705466Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 4, 1992
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ENGINEERING TOMORROW'S TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Ford

David J. Ford Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC150 West JeffersonSuite 2500Detroit, MI 48226

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040CUSTOM MANUFACTURING OF AUTOMOTIVE PARTS, COMPONENTS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR OTHERS; AND CUSTOM MANUFACTURING OF TOOLING FOR THE PRODUCTION OF MOTOR VEHICLES AND THEIR PARTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Mar 23, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 3, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 3, 20039G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Aug 2, 200289AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Aug 2, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 1998C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 28, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 4, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 12, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 1991PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 1991NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 12, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 30, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance