Drawing for TEELING'S PREMIUM

USPTO serial 73792745

TEELING'S PREMIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSENBURGH, ELISSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEELING'S PREMIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J. KERA

DAVID J KERA OBLON, FISHER, SPIVAK, ET ALCRYSTAL SQ FIVE - STE 4001755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, WHISKEYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 1993ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 23, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 28, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 12, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 5, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance