USPTO serial 73792762
HARRY'S RIO GRANDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 1990
- Examiner
- ROSENBURGH, ELISSA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HARRY'S RIO GRANDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
UNIONDALE, NY
ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
PORT WASHINGTON, NY
Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. SMITH
ROBERT W SMITH C/O MCCARTER AND ENGLISH, LLPFOUR GATEWAY CTR100 MULBERRY STNEWARK, NJ 07102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | [ CORN AND TORTILLA CHIPS, ] TACO SHELLS, TORTILLAS AND SALSA | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 9, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAIN FOOD GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL HAMPTON POTATO CHIP CO., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HARRY'S RIO GRANDE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |