Drawing for ALL LACROSSE

USPTO serial 73793010

ALL LACROSSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALL LACROSSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LOUIS S. GILLOW

LOUIS S GILLOW CARELLA, BYRNE, BAIN & GILFILLAN6 BECKER FARM RDROSELAND, NJ 07068UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, SHORTS, PANTS, SHIRTS AND CAPSABANDONEDJul 4, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 12, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 12, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 28, 1992CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 8, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 8, 1992JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 6, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 7, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 1, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 26, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance