USPTO serial 73793391
ARTEXTIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTEXTIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SABADELL, BARCELONA, ES
SABADELL, BARCELONA, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN COVENTRY SMITH, JR.
JOHN COVENTRY SMITH JR BENOIT, SMITH & LAUGHLINSTE 5012001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGWAYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FABRICS USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 18, 1991 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |