USPTO serial 73793559
AWA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 2, 1991
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AWA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113, AU
NORTH RYDE, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
NORTH RYDE, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE S WICK
LAWRENCE S WICK LEYDIG VOIT & MAYER LTD2 PRUDENTIAL PLZ STE 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR THE TRANSMISSION AND/OR RECEPTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES CARRYING INTELLIGENCE IN THE FORM OF SOUND, WRITINGS, IMAGES AND SIGNALS, OR A COMBINATION OF SUCH FORMS; AN ELECTRONIC AMPLIFIER, RECORDER, OR REPRODUCER OF AUDIBLE AND/OR VISUAL INTELLIGENCE; TELEPHONES OR TELEGRAPHS; ELECTRIC RAILROAD AND STREET TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CONTROLS; ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR THE CONTROL AND GUIDANCE OF MILITARY WEAPONS; ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; ELECTRONIC APPARATUS FOR AIR AND MARINE NAVIGATION; ACOUSTIC OR ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE DETECTORS; ELECTRONIC REMOTE CONTROLLERS; COMPUTING AND DATA PROCESSORS; ELECTRONIC DISCHARGERS AND SEMICONDUCTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 8, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |