Drawing for MELINA

USPTO serial 73793610

MELINA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, JERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MELINA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAN CHRISTENSEN

JAN CHRISTENSEN LEITNER, GREENE & CHRISTENSEN, PCSTE 203 CRYSTAL SQ 31735 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030BAKED GOODS, NAMELY BISCUITS AND CAKESABANDONEDNov 9, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 1992OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 10, 1991ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 28, 1991OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 16, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 23, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 2, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 8, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance