USPTO serial 73793699
NISTRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NISTRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHIBUYA-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON, ESQ.
LAWRENCE E APOLZON ESQ WEISS DAWID FROSS, ET AL633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CAPACITORS; AND PRINTERS FOR COMPUTERS OR WORD PROCESSORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |