USPTO serial 73794084
MILES.CARTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MILES.CARTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT A. VANDERHYE
ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE R D8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | CHAIRS, DESKS, TABLES, BENCHES, UPHOLSTERED SEATING, OCCASIONAL FURNITURE, STORAGE FURNITURE, SPECIAL ITEMS OF FURNITURE TO COMMISSION AND CHILDREN'S FURNITURE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |