Drawing for HAND HAMMERED WOK

USPTO serial 73794170

HAND HAMMERED WOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAND HAMMERED WOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY O. CORMIER

ANTHONY O CORMIER LAW OFFICE OF ANTHONY O CORMIER23161 VENTURA BLVD STE 102WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021COOKING SET PRIMARILY COMPRISING A WOK, RING, DOME, BRUSH, LADLE AND CHOPSTICKSACTIVEMay 23, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 16, 1992EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 12, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 10, 1992CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 28, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 29, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 1991CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 19, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance