USPTO serial 73794269
Serial No. 73794269
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 73794269?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GRASBRUNN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. STRIKER
MICHAEL J STRIKER360 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TELEVISION SETS, RADIOS, AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE PLAYERS, COMPACT DISCS PLAYERS, VIDEO TAPE RECORDERS AND VIDEO CAMERAS; DATA PROCESSORS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, COMMUNICATIONS, MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND DATA PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY; AND CUSTOM DESIGN OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |