USPTO serial 73794478
CREDIT CARD CRYING TOWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CREDIT CARD CRYING TOWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
COCONUT CREEK, FL
COCONUT CREEK, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H. OLTMAN
JOHN H OLTMAN OLTMAN AND FLYNN415 GALLERIA PROFESSIONAL BLDG915 MIDDLE RIVER DRFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33304-3585Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | TOWELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 10, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1989 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |