Drawing for SIGLAPLUS

USPTO serial 73794583

SIGLAPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1631507Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 1991
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SIGLAPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012FINISHED VEHICLE WINDOWS AND WINDSHIELDS, WITH OR WITHOUT THE FOLLOWING FEATURES; COATINGS OR FINISHES TO SCREEN OUT SUNLIGHT; INSULATING COATINGS OR FINISHES TO REGULATE THE TRANSFER OF HEAT; HEAT CONDUCTING WIRES; SERIAL OR ANTENNA WIRES; ANTI-SPLINTER FOIL COATINGS OR FINISHES; AND PROTECTIVE PLASTIC SCREENS OR TRANSPARENCIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2002CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 22, 1996C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 11, 1996815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 15, 1991R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1990CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 7, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 17, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance