USPTO serial 73794989
ECONOMY FLOR-DRI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 8, 1990
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECONOMY FLOR-DRI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BERKELEY SPRINGS, WV
BERKELEY SPRINGS, WV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. MACDERMOTT
MICHAEL J MACDERMOTT HARRIS, WALLEN, MACDERMOTT & TINSLEYQUINCY BLDG TOP FL650 S GRAND AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ALL PURPOSE ABSORBENTS FOR APPLICATION TO FLOORS AND OTHER SURFACES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 11, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 7, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 20, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |