Drawing for COOKIES AND DREAMS

USPTO serial 73795062

COOKIES AND DREAMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COOKIES AND DREAMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. APOLZON

LAWRENCE E APOLZON WEISS DAWID FROSS ZELNICK & LEHRMAN, PC633 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030FLOURS, PREPARATIONS MADE OF CEREALS, NAMELY BREAKFAST CEREALS, PROCESSED CEREALS, READY TO EAT CEREALS, FOOD BARS DERIVED FROM CEREAL, AND PASTRYABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 19, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 30, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 18, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 7, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 18, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 2, 1990CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance