USPTO serial 73795080
BEARFOOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEARFOOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BRADFORD, WEST YORKSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. DEITS
DAVID H DEITS SEED AND BERRY6300 COLUMBIA CTRSEATTLE, WA 98104-7092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | COOKWARE, COFFEEPOTS (NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL), TEAPOTS, BASINS, BOWLS, EGGCUPS, BUTTER DISHES, DISHES, PAPER PLATES, SAUCERS, CUPS, MUGS, TANKARDS (NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL), CONTAINERS FOR FOOD, SERVING TRAYS, COASTERS, GLASSWARE FOR DOMESTIC USE, BOTTLES, JUGS, HEAT INSULATED CONTAINERS FOR FOOD OR BEVERAGES, INSULATING FLASKS, VACUUM BOTTLES, VACUUM FLASKS, DRINKING FLASKS FOR TRAVELERS, PORTABLE HOUSEHOLD CONTAINERS, SOAP BOXES, SOAP CONTAINERS, SOAP DISHES, SOAP DISPENSERS, SOAP HOLDERS, MONEY BOXES (NOT OF METAL), COMB CASES, HAIR COMBS, BRUSHES FOR FOOTWEAR, TOOTHBRUSHES, HAIR BRUSHES, NAIL BRUSHES, SPONGES, BOTTLE OPENERS, AND CORKSCREWS; BUSTS, FIGURINES, STATUES AND STATUETTES, ALL OF CHINA, TERRACOTTA, GLASS, PORCELAIN OR EARTHENWARE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |