USPTO serial 73795351
DATACARRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DATACARRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KAWASAKI-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER, SCHWARTZ, ET ALP O BOX 299ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-0299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERIZED CARD-SHAPED MEMORY UNITS FEATURING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MODULES AND COMPUTERIZED READING AND/OR WRITING MACHINES FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF; PRODUCTION PROCESS CONTROL IN FACTORIES; IDENTIFICATION; AMUSEMENTS, NAMELY TV GAMES; MUSICAL PERFORMANCE, NAMELY ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAPHY, NAMELY INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARD CAMERAS; FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; MEASUREMENT, NAMELY MEMORY OF DATA MEASURES; MEDICAL CARE, NAMELY MEMORY OF PATIENTS HISTORY; AND OFFICE MACHINES, NAMELY PERSONAL COMPUTERS, COPY MACHINES AND WORD PROCESSORS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |