USPTO serial 73795613
MONSTER 4 X 4
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 1990
- Examiner
- HANKIN, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONSTER 4 X 4?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M. MCCORMACK
JOHN M MCCORMACK KOLISCH, HARTWELL & DICKINSONSTE 200520 S W YAMHILLPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | TOY VEHICLES CAPABLE OF BEING RIDDEN | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 20, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1997 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 25, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 29, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 1990 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 1, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |