Drawing for ROCKERS

USPTO serial 73796269

ROCKERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT L. BAUM, ESQ.

ROBERT L BAUM ESQ ARENT, FOX, KINTNER, PLOTKIN & KAHN1050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-SHIRTSABANDONEDNov 28, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1992EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 18, 1992ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 8, 1992EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Sep 27, 1991CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 7, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 15, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 6, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance