USPTO serial 73798226
MODERN MEDIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODERN MEDIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1012 EE AMSTERDAM, NL
1012 EE AMSTERDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GAIL E. HAEFNER
GAIL E HAEFNER PAUL, FRANK AND COLLINS, INCONE CHURCH STP O BOX 1307BURLINGTON, VT 05402-1307Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF COMPUTER-GENERATED PICTURES, FILMS AND VIDEO-ANIMATIONS; CONSULTATION SERVICES REGARDING THE PRODUCTION OF COMPUTER-GENERATED PICTURES, FILMS AND VIDEO-ANIMATIONS; PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN PRODUCING COMPUTER-GENERATED PICTURES, FILMS AND VIDEO-ANIMATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING RESEARCH IN AND CONSULTING SERVICES TO THE COMPUTER INDUSTRY | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 1991 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 22, 1991 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |