USPTO serial 73799547
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARTH X. DEROSA
BARTH X DEROSA WATSON, COLE, GRINDLE & WATSON1400 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS ACQUISITION AND MERGER CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY IN THE PURCHASE OF WAREHOUSES AND STORAGE FACILITIES; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY MANAGEMENT OF WAREHOUSES AND OTHER STORAGE FACILITIES; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | LAND AND WAREHOUSE ACQUISITION SERVICES, NAMELY REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES IN THE LAND AND WAREHOUSE FIELD | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY PLANNING, LAYING OUT AND CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION OF WAREHOUSE AND STORAGE FACILITIES; VEHICLE MAINTENANCE, SERVICING AND REPAIR SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES BY TRUCKS; HAULAGE SERVICES BY TRUCK | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VEHICLES, AND COMPUTER MODELLING AND COMPUTER TIME-SHARING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FREIGHT STORAGE AND WAREHOUSING | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |