USPTO serial 73799677
LONOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUBEL, ELLEN A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LONOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MURRAY SCHAFFER
MURRAY SCHAFFER BAUER & SCHAFFER114 OLD COUNTRY RDSTE 344MINEOLA, NY 11501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | BOILERS, HEAT EXCHANGERS, THERMAL FLUID HEATERS, AND STEAM HEATERS | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 19, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 26, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |