Drawing for ROAD HAWG

USPTO serial 73799966

ROAD HAWG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1664629Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 12, 1991
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
FILE DESTROYED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROAD HAWG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RALPH W. KALISH

RALPH W KALISH KALISH & GILSTER500 N BROADWAY STE 1200ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-SHIRTSSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDApr 18, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 1992CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 6, 1992CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 14, 1992PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 1991R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 1, 1991CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 28, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 15, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance