USPTO serial 73800022
GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF
DEBORAH SCHAVEY RUFF NEUMAN, WILLIAMS, ANDERSON & OLSON77 W WASHINGTON STCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | PEANUT BUTTER; RAISINS; PROCESSED NUTS; SARDINES; FRANKFURTERS; TURKEY; CANNED TUNA; CHEESE, NAMELY CHEDDAR AND MOZZARELLA; VEGETABLE OIL FOR COOKING; SALAD DRESSING; MARGARINE; MAYONNAISE; AND FRUIT BASED FILLINGS FOR PIE | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | SAUCES, BAKING AND COOKING PRODUCTS; SNACK FOODS; CANDY; SYRUPS; CONDIMENTS; FLAVORINGS AND COLORINGS; SPICES; AND ROCK SALT | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | BEVERAGES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |