USPTO serial 73804021
COS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
TA C C SYSTEMS COHEN SYSTEMS INC#20411380 PROSPERITY FARMS RDPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE BY OPHTHALMOLOGISTS, OPTOMETRISTS AND OPTICIANS IN MANAGING AND ADMINISTERING THEIR PRACTICES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |