Drawing for ZANTAC

USPTO serial 73804230

ZANTAC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLUE, RACHEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZANTAC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DICKERSON DOWNING, ESQ.

DICKERSON DOWNING ESQ MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041INFORMATIONAL AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES NAMELY THE DISSEMINATION AND COLLECTION OF INFORMATION PERTAINING TO RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICAL DISORDERSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 10, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance