USPTO serial 73804673
WORDLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORDLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
THORNHILL, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. PARR
RICHARD J PARRSCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WSTE 4000 BOX 401TORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MECHANICAL COMBINATION PADLOCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |