USPTO serial 73805890
THERMAVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 7, 1992
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THERMAVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
NEW YORK, NY
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A. DE MEYERE
PATRICIA A DE MEYERE ANDERSON KILL OLICK & OSHINSKY, PC1251 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | REUSABLE ELASTOMERIC SILICONE RUBBER VACUUM BAGGING MATERIALS, FOR PRESSING AND MOLDING RESIN COMPOSITIONS, USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF STRUCTURAL COMPOSITE PARTS FOR AIRCRAFT AND IN AUTOCLAVE, HYDRAULIC, AND ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY LAMINATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 7, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 16, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |