USPTO serial 73805917
ECHO MARIO VALENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECHO MARIO VALENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARSHA G. AJHAR, ESQ.
JAY H BEGLER HARRIS, BEACH & WILCOX250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | TOILET SOAPS; PERFUMES; EAU DE COLOGNE; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, MOISTURIZING BODY LOTION; NON-MEDICATED TOILET PREPARATIONS, NAMELY BATH AND SHOWER GEL; PRE- AND AFTER-SHAVE LOTIONS; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOO AND HAIR RINSE; DENTIFRICES; DEODORANTS AND ANTI-PERSPIRANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |