USPTO serial 73806416
LADYSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 1991
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LADYSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
5500 MIDDLEFART, DK
5500 MIDDLEFART, DK
5500 MIDDLEFART, DK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA L. BERKOWITZ
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CHEESE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 1998 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 31, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 8, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 19, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1991 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |