USPTO serial 73806569
R-SKILLS UNLIMITED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R-SKILLS UNLIMITED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WINNIPEG, MANITOBA, CA
WINNIPEG, MANITOBA, CA
WINNIPEG, MANITOBA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY E. JOHNSON
STANLEY E JOHNSON BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS99 BANK ST8TH FLOTTAWA, ON K1P 6C1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND PROGRAM MANUALS, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT FOR USE IN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS AND SKILLS INVENTORY APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Sep 23, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCCLURE, BARRY
- Other trademarks owned by MCCLURE, GREGORY
- Other trademarks owned by GREBAR SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named R-SKILLS UNLIMITED
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |