USPTO serial 73807122
THE DRIFTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE DRIFTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Claude W. Roxborough
CLAUDE W. ROXBOROUGH ROXBOROUGH & TILLERSON3001 GEORGIA AVENUEN.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF SINGING GROUP | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |