USPTO serial 73807141
BOSTON'S THE GOURMET PIZZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 1994
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with BOSTON'S THE GOURMET PIZZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
BP INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS HOLDINGS, INC
Richmond, B.C., CA
Other trademarks owned by BP INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS HOLDINGS, INC
TRELIVING PRIVATE INVESTMENTS LTD.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by TRELIVING PRIVATE INVESTMENTS LTD.
BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene M. Krogh
Charlene M. Krogh DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 WEWATTA STREET, SUITE 400IP DEPARTMENTDENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BP INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS HOLDINGS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by TRELIVING PRIVATE INVESTMENTS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BOSTON PIZZA INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BOSTON'S THE GOURMET PIZZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 14, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2023 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 16, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 16, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2013 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | 15AB | AFFIDAVIT UNDER SECT 15 ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EPRR | TEAS PETITION FOR POST REGISTRATION MATTERS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CCCN | COUNTERCLAIM CANC. NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |