Drawing for MEALS-ON-WHEELS AMERICA FOR HOMEBOUND ELDERLY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EFFORT

USPTO serial 73807387

MEALS-ON-WHEELS AMERICA FOR HOMEBOUND ELDERLY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EFFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1714792Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 1992
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MEALS-ON-WHEELS AMERICA FOR HOMEBOUND ELDERLY TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EFFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT S STOLL

ROBERT S STOLL STOLL MISKIN PREVITO HOFFMAN & BADIE6110 EMPIRE STATE BLDGNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES; NAMELY, ADVISING AND ASSISTING IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND/OR OPERATION OF CHARITABLE SERVICES THAT PROVIDE MEALS TO THE ELDERLY AND CHARITABLE FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9โ€”
Oct 22, 19988.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 5, 19988.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILEDโ€”
Sep 8, 1992R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Mar 21, 1992CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERโ€”
Feb 18, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jan 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 14, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 29, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 29, 1990CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 1990ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
Mar 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 21, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance