USPTO serial 73807496
MIKROPOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 1991
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIKROPOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
6335 LAHNAU 2, DE
WILHELMI WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAF
LAHNAU, DE
6335 LAHNAU 2, DE
6335 LAHNAU 2, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR
GEORGE A. PELLETIER, JR CANTOR COLBURN LLP22ND FLOOR20 CHURCH STREETHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WILHELMI WERKE GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WILHELMI WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAF
- Other trademarks owned by WILHELMI WERKE GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by WILHELMI WERKE GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named MIKROPOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2013 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 13, 2001 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 1989 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |