USPTO serial 73807499
KERAPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KERAPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK H. ANDORKA
FRANK H ANDORKA BAKER & HOSTETLER3200 NATIONAL CITY CTRCLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | KERATIN SUPPLEMENT SOLD AS A COMPONENT OF HAIR COLORING AND PERMANENT PREPARATIONS, FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY | ABANDONED | Dec 2, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |