USPTO serial 73808243
TECTRODE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECTRODE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. JOHN CAMPAIGN
H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PC36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL BUILDING MATERIALS; METAL REINFORCING AND PROTECTIVE STRUCTURE FOR CEMENTITIOUS BUILDING MATERIALS; METAL COMPONENTS FOR USE IN BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING TO PREVENT OR ASSIST IN PREVENTION OF CHEMICAL OR ELECTROLYTIC CORROSION OF FERROUS METAL STRUCTURE AND REINFORCEMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRODES FOR BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS; ANODES FOR CATHODIC PROTECTION; ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE METAL COMPONENTS FOR USE IN PROTECTING BUILDINGS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AGAINST CHEMICAL AND ELECTROLYTIC CORROSION OR FOR USE AS EARTHING COMPONENTS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 18, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |