USPTO serial 73808648
KLOISONNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JEFFRIES, STEPHEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLOISONNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GORDON D. COPLEIN
GORDON D COPLEIN DARBY & DARBY PC805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KIT OF MANICURE IMPLEMENTS COMPRISED OF NAIL CLIPPER, TOE NAIL CLIPPER, CUTICLE TRIMMER, CUTICLE PUSHER AND SAPPHIRE FILE | ABANDONED | Sep 2, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1992 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 10, 1991 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 6, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1991 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 1990 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |