USPTO serial 73809038
CALIFORNIA BODYGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALIFORNIA BODYGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E SHLESINGER SHLESINGER & MYERS3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | SWIMWEAR, SWIMSUITS, BIKINIS, JUMPSUITS, PANTS, SUSPENDERS, BICYCLE SHORTS AND TOPS, VOLLEYBALL SHORTS, T-SHIRTS, SHORTS AND TANK TOPS, LEGGINGS, EXERCISE SHORTS AND UNITARDS | ABANDONED | Nov 10, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1992 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |