USPTO serial 73809049
MD FAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 1993
- Examiner
- MCDONALD, MARY KAY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MD FAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN S4S 4C7, CA
REGINA, SASKATCHEWAN S4S 4C7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCELLA A. STAPOR
MARCELLA A STAPOR LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY, BEGLER & PEROFF41 MADISON AVE 40TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION FROM A CONFIDENTIAL MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM VIA FACSIMILE TECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1999 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 28, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |