USPTO serial 73809062
EPCO-TEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPCO-TEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BENJAMIN P. REESE, II
BENJAMIN P REESE II DOMINIK, STEIN, SACCOCIO, REESE, ET AL3030 N ROCKY POINT DR WSTE 400TAMPA, FL 33607-5904Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | BARNACLE AND MOLLUSK REPELLANT EPOXY BARRIER COATINGS FOR APPLICATION TO SURFACES EXPOSED TO A MARINE ENVIRONMENT | ABANDONED | Apr 12, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1991 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 1990 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1990 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 30, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |