Drawing for Serial No. 73809480

USPTO serial 73809480

Serial No. 73809480

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 73809480?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A. EINHORN

DAVID A EINHORN ANDERSON KILL OLICK & OSHINSKY, PC666 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033LIQUEURABANDONEDApr 25, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 1991ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 13, 1991EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 1991ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 1991CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 2, 1991JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 2, 1991EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 14, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 21, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 1990CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance