USPTO serial 73809901
PLEASURE SHIPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLEASURE SHIPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM T. BOLAND, JR.
WILLIAM T BOLAND JR KENYON & KENYONONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | CRUISE SHIP SERVICES | ABANDONED | Mar 20, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 5, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 5, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 1991 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 9, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |