USPTO serial 73810140
LX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 7, 1991
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
BEIJING, CN
Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
BEIJING, CN
Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
BEIJING, CN
Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
BEIJING, 1000080, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID S KASHMAN
DAVID S KASHMAN GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN270 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-0601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER CARDS WITH CHINESE LANGUAGE CONVERSION CAPABILITY, PERSONAL COMPUTER FAX CARDS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS AND INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT, PROGRAMMABLE CONTROLLERS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, ALL FOR BUSINESS, INDUSTRIAL, AND PERSONAL USE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by NEW TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPER, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by LEGEND GROUP CO.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2002 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 29, 1997 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 5, 1997 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 7, 1991 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 12, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 1, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |