Drawing for VISUAL BUSINESS NO. 5

USPTO serial 73810200

VISUAL BUSINESS NO. 5

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUAL BUSINESS NO. 5?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES R. SIMS III

JAMES R SIMS III MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS1800 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE DESIGN OF PROFESSIONAL CHARTS AND GRAPHSABANDONEDApr 17, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 1990ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Feb 27, 1990PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 1990NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 1989CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 1989CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 7, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance